Yikes. Wondered why the "Best Practices" were so underwhelming… I'm definitely staying tuned! Thanks!! — Joel Winston (@joelwinston) August 1, 2018
Archive | Featured
RSS feed for this section@futureofprivacy You recently introduced “Privacy Best Practices for Consumer Genetic Testing Services”. Do you have any financial affiliation or receive monetary support from Ancestry, 23andMe, Helix, or other DNA testing companies? Asking for a friend…
@futureofprivacy You recently introduced "Privacy Best Practices for Consumer Genetic Testing Services". Do you have any financial affiliation or receive monetary support from Ancestry, 23andMe, Helix, or other DNA testing companies? Asking for a friend… — Joel Winston (@joelwinston) August 1, 2018
@kristenvbrown Your DNA was martyred! Wondering your thoughts on the Future of Privacy Forum “Privacy Best Practices for Consumer Genetic Testing Services” framework?
Your DNA was martyred! Wondering your thoughts on the Future of Privacy Forum "Privacy Best Practices for Consumer Genetic Testing Services" framework? — Joel Winston (@joelwinston) August 1, 2018
RT @Davidlaz: Consumer agency is hated by Trump and GOP lawmakers. It’s supported by consumers. Millions of them. Republican and Democrat h…
Consumer agency is hated by Trump and GOP lawmakers. It's supported by consumers. Millions of them. Republican and Democrat https://t.co/wuGUL54a4Y — David Lazarus (@Davidlaz) July 31, 2018
“Facebook took the methods it learned from the Trump campaign to further refine a marketing model called “Test, Learn, Adapt” (TLA).” https://t.co/LkGLcOOamL
"Facebook took the methods it learned from the Trump campaign to further refine a marketing model called “Test, Learn, Adapt” (TLA)." https://t.co/LkGLcOOamL — Joel Winston (@joelwinston) August 1, 2018
This is privacy journalism in 2018 – @kristenvbrown sacrifices her own DNA so that others may keep their DNA private https://t.co/WEr0G41rkC
This is privacy journalism in 2018 – @kristenvbrown sacrifices her own DNA so that others may keep their DNA private https://t.co/WEr0G41rkC — Joel Winston (@joelwinston) August 1, 2018
In which DNA data mining companies Ancestry, 23andMe, and Helix engage in public relations puffery on privacy… https://t.co/YrTQAD6D4K
In which DNA data mining companies Ancestry, 23andMe, and Helix engage in public relations puffery on privacy… https://t.co/YrTQAD6D4K — Joel Winston (@joelwinston) August 1, 2018
RT @antonioregalado: 5/ You can drive a bus through this exception. The privacy standards don’t apply to “de-identified” data. https://t.co…
5/ You can drive a bus through this exception. The privacy standards don't apply to "de-identified" data. pic.twitter.com/wv5xEMzyhI — Antonio Regalado (@antonioregalado) July 31, 2018
This is criminal. “A federal judge on Monday found that U.S. government officials have been giving psychotropic medication to migrant children at a Texas facility without first seeking the consent.” https://t.co/gQdXUfIdDy
This is criminal. "A federal judge on Monday found that U.S. government officials have been giving psychotropic medication to migrant children at a Texas facility without first seeking the consent." https://t.co/gQdXUfIdDy — Joel Winston (@joelwinston) July 31, 2018
@cfarivar Sorry! If you’re feeling deceived, you can arbitrate. But lose and you’ll have to pay 23andMe’s legal bills… https://t.co/Ckf60Saxg8
Sorry! If you're feeling deceived, you can arbitrate. But lose and you'll have to pay 23andMe's legal bills… pic.twitter.com/Ckf60Saxg8 — Joel Winston (@joelwinston) July 30, 2018
